|
|
|
Author
| Message |
|---|
|
|
How do Queen Alice ratings compare against ratings on other sites or in the real world? I've only joined recently and I'm trying to determine what would be a reasonable target for me. On chessbase I'm 2000, on uchess I'm only 1600. Unfortunately I live in England where we don't use the ELO system, but my ECF rating is 163.
So far on queen alice I've beaten ~1900 players fairly easily, but lost badly twice against a ~2100 player. It seems to me that theres a sharp improvement in standards for only a couple of hundred rating points which I find surprising.
|
|
|
First, you only played 15 games, which is hardly enough for a decent rating. Secondly, the two games you lost, you resigned. From the quick glance I gave them I don't quite see why, but that is your decission.
|
|
|
You must have looked something wrong, since both of the games were quite clearly lost for jahhaj.
|
|
|
Esnar,You are right there.
http://www.queenalice.com//game.php?id=235211
is at least another 45 moves away from a checkmate. In those 45 moves an error or mistake is of course always possible.
http://www.queenalice.com//game.php?id=235212 is indeed a lost game.
|
|
|
Harir, I was asking about the ratings on Queen Alice compared to elsewhere, not about my personal rating, nor about whether I was right to resign a particular game or not.
|
|
|
|
|
