|
|
|
Topic: Totalitarian Chess
| |
|
|
Author
| Message |
|---|
|
|
All this is completely beside the point.
|
|
|
You implied that white could win on his first move by capturing his king.
|
|
|
Onceupon,
You should do like I do: completely ignore these threads. Evjen and Fauquinelle seem to think it's a marvellous idea to change the whole game "just for the heck of it" and they also seem to think everyone would agree with them.
The way I see it, apart from new messages every once in a while which would inevitably generate a few responses, they'd end up having discussions together, alone, isolated from the rest of the members, which wouldn't be bad at all.
What I'm trying to say is, maybe you're better off ignoring them. 
|
|
|
| You implied that white could win on his first move by capturing his king. |
No. I demonstrated this.
| What I'm trying to say is, maybe you're better off ignoring them. |
Then where would the fun be 
|
|
|
"...The king has no special prerogative and accordingly:
o It may be captured like any other piece.
....
A player wins by losing all his pieces...."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_chess
|
| Previous 1 2 3 4 Next |
|
|
|
