|
|
|
Topic: Queenalice too extreme?
| |
|
|
Author
| Message |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
I saw an open game this day... only for 3500+ players.. and I saw a 99999+ 
http://www.queenalice.com/game.php?id=80236
http://www.queenalice.com/game.php?id=80237
I think that the most problems of rating inflation here exist because of the "initial provisional rating" that should be a "fixed" value, not a generated one...
Anyway, QueenAlice is doing a great joob on Internet Chess Club. And I see Miguel is having some personal problems now. We should thaks him for the excelent joob done so far !
I believe that the site can be improved. Rating system... Personal Info, better forums (like the ones that alert you by e-mail when someone post a message on a forum you had posted early or the ones you wanted to...
We also could have something to create teams... Open our tournaments, etc...
I think we will have all this and much more on future. And as I like this place a lot, I will donate as soon as I get out of some personal problems...
And I will help, as I can, people on forums...
-----
|
|
|
I will say this one more time: ratings that end with a 'p' are provisional, they mean nothing. If you see a 'p' after a rating then it isn't fair to assume that's the real playing strength of the player.
That said, I do agree that some people take advantage of the system by playing fake games, and I do want to eliminate that from this site. I will be making modifications to the rating system soon, but first there is a server move that I need to complete to solve the down times.
Miguel
|
| Previous 1 2 3 |
|
|
|
