1. e4 c6 2. Nc3 d5 The Caro Kann. If you study this line you might be tempted to take the pawn with
3... dxe4 because it looks familiar. However, it is not the same as in the main line Caro Kann and white hopes to get an advantage with that exchange.
3. Nf3 Bg4 4. d4 e6 5. h3 Bxf3 Actually
5... Bh5 is more accurate ... however, when I used to teach, I would recommend that students save time on study
( if they had no interest in studying ) and choose a line that would be easy to remember.
6. Qxf3 dxe4 7. Nxe4 Normally taking the d pawn in the Caro Kann invites problems with Nf3 and an attack with both knights on
7. However, in this case one knight is off the board and the win of a center pawn is worth some development problems if you can make it out of the opening without getting crushed...<>
7... Qxd4 8. Bd3 Nd7 9. Be3 Qb4+ Maybe a good game for students to review the issue of development or in this case lack of development. By offering me the b-pawn white is saying, "Ok, you want pawns, let's see if you can make it out of the opening." After white castles you could consider that he has developed 5 pieces to my two. However, in the Caro Kann, if you're very very careful you can live to fight. Students should remember the knight moves in a varation of the Caro Kann that appears to break opening principles. Dreev
( 2690 ) tried
9... Qd5 and did well but I want to try something different.
10. Bd2 Qxb2 A good example of being commited to a line of play, if you feel you don't like this type of play
( un-developed ) then don't take the pawn on
4. It is like when you start an attack if you don't see it to the end or chicken out at the last moment your game falls apart. You must ask yourself these questions, can black catch up in development yes or no? and if yes what would his short term and long term plans be? You may have heard or been taught not to take the b-pawn with your Queen and this is good advice. How many so called rules have I broken in this game and will I pay for my errors? Only time will tell.
11. 0-0 Ne5 If you play caro kann or slav pawn structures you must understand why black might be drawn to this type of line even though it is still unproven. Black is undeveloped, white has no strong center and black is using the e5 square that is normally used by white. It is almost like black has decided to use white's tactics in this opening and defense.
12. Qg3 Nxd3 13. cxd3 Nf6 You could probally find a better move than ...Nf6 however, for my style of game this appears to be the most logical choice.
14. Bc3 Nxe4 15. dxe4 Qa3 16. Rab1 0-0-0 So here we are on move 16 and you could say black has made it out of the opening a little behind in development. I judge the position as equal. You might ask, black is two pawns up how can you say the position is equal? The issue is black is behind in development, to put it another way white has an advantage in time, black has an advantge in material.
16... 0-0-0, if you look at the position, what else is there? I guess you could try ...b6 but that only creates a target at
6. 17. Qf3 Bc5 To be honest I never considered the move
17. Qf3; however, the move has some good points, it gets the queen off the g file and attacks the f7 pawn. It also indirectly hits on b7
( theory of squares ) . Review my last comments
( on move 16 ) and you will understand why I played bishop to
5. 18. Rb3 Qxa2 19. Bxg7 Rhg8 Black knew he was going to have to give back some material to catch up in development
( time ) .
20. Rb2 Qa6 As I said in my comments earlier b7 is a target that must be watched. Just for interest white may have considered the f-pawn and wisely rejected that idea. This is an interesting time to explain how you can spot moves quickly using the theory of squares as a quide. I mentioned b7 in my comments, why to I consider b7 an issue, well if you look at the board quicky you will notice that b7 is being attacked directly by the rook on b2 and indirectly by the queen on
3. This information is enough to warrant a close look at this square. I also mentioned the f-pawn would be a bad choice for white and using the same theory you see that black attacks d4 directly with the bishop on c5 and directly with the rook on
8. Using this information which took about 3 seconds to find or notice gives you valuable information about what is happening on the board.
21. Qxf7 Rxg7 Read my comments on move 20 as to why I feel this capture is wrong. I like this game because it is different in the sense that black used a lot of ideas normally used by white to take control of this game. White was not allowed to setup an attack and with every exchange blacks game became better and better or should I say safer and safer
( for black ) . I was online commenting on a Kasparov win today
( while it was being played ) and was the only one to see c5 was the key square for his game and moves like Ne1 and then Nd3 to cover off c5 were the key moves in that game.
( theory of squares ) .
0-1