|
|
|
Author
| Message |
|---|
|
|
DuskXIV wrote:
richerby wrote:
| [...]Doesn't that sound unlikely? |
Nope. That's what every computer does, as far as I know. |
Sorry, I missed a couple of important words from my post! What I meant to say was this.
Your program is so simple that you can follow its algorithm on paper in a few minutes per move. Playing real over-the-board chess requires exactly this: taking a few minutes per move. So, if your simple algorithm can play strong chess then anybody at all can play strong over-the-board chess at regular time controls by following your algorithm, as long as they're allowed to make notes and maybe use a calculator. That seems very unlikely to me. Chess seems to be much harder than that to play well.
Blutigeroo wrote:
| Using the Opening Browser on this site is using a "computer or computer program to evaluate or analyze a game". |
*sigh* The very next sentences on the site's about page:
| However, you may use computers for record keeping. It is also allowed to consult chess books and opening databases. |
Dave.
|
|
|
Exactly whyBish! It is the intent that is important. The rule itself is open to interpretation. Taken literally one could get a bit silly and say that it states that you can't use a chess program at any time ... during or after a game!
Good point too, richerby. There are already exceptions to this supposedly black and white rule.
|
|
|
a cada dia fico acreditando mais e mais que a maioria dos jogadores aqui no AQ usam programas,
|
|
|
a cada dia fico acreditando mais e mais que a maioria dos jogadores aqui no AQ usam programas,
|
|
|
Eu acho que muitos usam, mas não a maioria. Eu faço uma avaliação individual do jogador quando a partida é desafio e estou jogando poucos torneios já que nos torneios não escolhemos oponentes.
Quando um determinado jogador tem um número disparado de vitórias e poucas derrotas, realmente fico desconfiado. Ele pode ser um grande jogador, mas é dificil ser imabatível.
|
| Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next |
|
|
|
