|
|
|
Topic: Why only 50 games to be available to play tournaments?
| |
|
|
Author
| Message |
|---|
|
|
There should be no limits... as I see, people who are under 50 give up quickly more often. Please, at least answer me¬¬
|
|
|
It was there, but a situation led him to take this decision.
|
|
|
which situation?
|
|
|
This was implemented a few years ago, if you search the forums around 2007 you'll find a few topics about it, like this one:
http://www.queenalice.com/topic.php?id=12948&page=1
As Miguel answered on this one, it was to prevent some players from abusing the system by entering in hundreds of tournaments.
|
|
|
Hmm, interesting. Personally, I would not like to be in so many games or tournaments at once. But why not give the chess die-hards the opportunity to call, say, seventy or eighty tournaments? And if they team up, they could all call as many tournaments as they can and all join as many of those as they like. QA can have its enclave of adictos al ajedrez and the more casual players can take their their own sweet time. I'm sure the server can handle that!
F.
|
|
|
I totaally agree with Fauquinelle.
E valeu aí Savik pelo comentário.
|
| 1 2 Next |
|
|
|
