|
|
Author
| Message |
|
You know what, you're right. I don't know, for some reason I thought Black couldn't catch the pawn.
Oh well.
That's okay, I have a good rating. People won't know.
|
|
I've been going to a physical chess club lately and wsa looking at a position last week where all I could see was white was lost, and everyone around the board was saying what a great position white has... I guess they were right given that they are rated way higher than me, but I couldn't even see it after their explanations. Sometimes the emperor has no clothes, but sometimes he really does, and it's just you that can't see them
|
|
Games in progress should not be discussed in the forum. Besides that, white is higher rated and etiquette (if chess players adhere to such a thing these days) would dictate that he should be the one to offer the draw. In any case there is nothing wrong with maneuvering if one thinks there is a chance his opponent will make a mistake. It may be irritating but there is nothing wrong with it and all you can do is play on and prove your evaluation is correct.
Irritating. That’s a factor. One former CC champion said you should play on for a while before resigning (or possibly offering a draw) because it often annoys an opponent and sometimes in their angered state they won’t think clearly and will make a mistake.
|
|
First time I've ever heard of it being up to the higher rated player to offer a draw.Is this generally accepted across the board ? (figure of speech)
|
|
I knew a guy who was invited to play in a tournament at the state fair. He refused to play. When asked why he would not play in the tournament he replied, "I am not a fair player."
|
Previous 1 2 3 Next |
|
|
|