Author
| Message |
|
Monicker: The rules allow you to consult chess books for that.
Opening databases are allowed.
Please read the previous discussion before posting. It was started by a player who suspected his opponent of using a chess engine, and asked what he should do.
|
|
Perhaps you should pay better attention to my reply, and to whom I was replying.
I was responding to Tewald. So how is my response to him not relevant about endgame tablebases?
Opening books and endgame tablebases are NOT the same thing.
|
|
I'd like to know how strong my chess engine is. Would it be OK to create an account for my chess engine to play on this site, as long as I make it clear to potential opponents* that they are facing a chess engine? Some may wish to play chess engines.
*The account profile will state "This account is used by a chess engine". In addition, when I create an open game, I will post a message to potential opponents, indicating that they are about to face a chess engine.
P.S. This is just an experimental idea.
|
|
Monicker: I meant that you could consult chess books to learn how to mate with K+B+B v K.
|
|
Okay.
Learning the principles of how to handle those endings from a chess book is not the same as using the perfect knowledge contained within a endgame tablebase.
Its easy to learn the principle of how to mate with a K+Q vs K, but does that mean someone should access a tablebase which will show them EXACTLY which moves to make in order to achieve mate?
|
Previous 1 2 3 Next |