|
|
|
Topic: PKC (Protected King Check) Chess Varient
| |
|
|
Author
| Message |
|---|
|
|
Following is an example of checkmate:
|
But White has Kg1.
Better still, play continues:
1. Kxf2 Bxf2 ½-½ (insufficient mating material) 
|
|
|
you're right.. White has Kg1... well that's embarrassing now, I can't wait for his response
|
|
|
| you're right.. White has Kg1... |
You and and Ounceupon are correct. The white king could move next to the white bishop, and thereby get out of check, since it would be protected.
| well that's embarrassing now, I can't wait for his response |
It is true that I made a mistake, but your comments at least show that you understood what I was trying to say.
Therefore, it must make some sense to you guys at least, (even if you think it is a stupid idea.) 
I should have posted something like the following position instead:
Above, is a true PKC checkmate.
Note: Above is not a true checkmate (as Onceupon astutely recognized,)
since the king can move to a protected spot on the board, or the bishop may move to protect him.
Better still, play continues:
1. Kxf2 Bxf2 ½-½ (insufficient mating material) |
In PKC chess, the object could simply be stated as trying to capture the opponent's king without losing your own.
(That is not the best way to word it, however. I will post more on that later, as well as something else that I recently realized should be included in the rules.)
|
|
|
If KxK, whether protected or not, you "lost your own [king]", so you lost.
Maybe we should just let you vomit all of your stupid ideas and ignore you, because it doesn't seem like you're going to use your brain and stop otherwise.
|
|
|
| Above, is a true PKC checkmate. |
This is a worse example, since now we have two possible responses:
Ke2
or
Be2
Well, I have gained a little weight 
| Therefore, it must make some sense to you guys at least, (even if you think it is a stupid idea.) |
If it's a stupid idea, what else would matter? 
| I will post more on that later, as well as something else that I recently realized should be included in the rules. |
Oh, God. No! 
|
| Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next |
|
|
|
